Methodology 06

Weighting & Aggregation

HPI applies reasoned weighting and aggregation rules to ensure that indicators, sections, and pillars combine into a balanced, transparent, and meaningful overall result.

Methodology
Aggregation Balance
89.5
/100
Excellent
Sensitivity
+4.0 points
Pillar
Priority
Priority High
Pillar
Indicator Weights 88.9 /100
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Section Weights 89.4 /100
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Pillar Weights 90.2 (per 1,000 patient days)
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Sensitivity Testing 87.8
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Aggregation Clarity 89.7
Excellent
Pillar
What It Covers
  • Weight assignment to indicators, sections, and pillars
  • Rationale for weights based on evidence and impact
  • Aggregation formula and hierarchical roll-up
  • Balancing of clinical, operational, and experience factors
  • Sensitivity analysis to test impact of weight changes
  • Comparability across hospitals and time periods
  • Fairness and transparency in weighting decisions
building
Core Sections
Key Elements
  • Evidence-based weight rationale
  • Hierarchical aggregation structure
  • Proportional and practical balance
  • Robust sensitivity analysis
  • Consistent rules across all hospitals
  • Adjustable yet controlled framework
  • Transparency and reproducibility
Risk Signals
  • Over-weighting narrow measures
  • Hidden bias in weight assignment
  • Unstable results from small changes
  • Unclear or undocumented formula
  • Poor sensitivity testing practices
Dashboard Preview
slide 1
slide 1
slide 1
slide 1
Improvement Actions
  • Document and review weight rationale regularly
  • Conduct sensitivity testing for key components
  • Ensure balance across all pillars and domains
  • Validate weights with internal and external experts
  • Update weights as evidence and priorities evolve
Pillar
Want to understand the HPI methodology?
Explore how our scientific, transparent and continuous approach delivers fair and reliable hospital performance insights.
Explore This Method