Methodology 07

Benchmarking

HPI compares results internally over time and externally against peers, standards, and best practices to provide meaningful performance context and drive improvement.

Methodology
Benchmark Relevance
90.8
/100
Excellent
Comparability
+5.0 points
Pillar
Priority
Priority Strategic Performance Context
Pillar
Internal Trends 91.2 /100
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Peer Comparison 89.7 /100
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Best Practice Alignment 90.3 (per 1,000 patient days)
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Global Reference 88.9
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Context Fit 89.5
Excellent
Pillar
What It Covers
  • Peer groups and comparable hospitals
  • Internal performance trends over time
  • External standards and global references
  • Leading performers and best practices
  • Contextual interpretation of results
  • Aspiration setting and goal alignment
  • Progress tracking and performance gaps
building
Core Sections
Key Elements
  • Comparable peer selection
  • Risk-adjusted comparisons
  • Rolling trend perspective
  • Best practice identification
  • Global and national benchmarks
  • Contextual performance analysis
  • Meaningful performance gaps
  • Actionable insight generation
Risk Signals
  • Unfair peer comparison
  • Outdated comparators
  • Missing contextual variables
  • Overgeneralized ranking
  • Weak benchmark definitions
Dashboard Preview
slide 1
slide 1
slide 1
slide 1
Improvement Actions
  • Select the most relevant and comparable peer groups
  • Regularly review and update benchmark sets
  • Use risk adjustment to ensure fair comparisons
  • Interpret results in the right contextual lens
  • Leverage best practices from leading performers
Pillar
Want to understand the HPI methodology?
Explore how our scientific, transparent and continuous approach delivers fair and reliable hospital performance insights.
Explore This Method