Methodology 05

Scoring Methodology

HPI uses a transparent scoring system to convert validated indicators into a consistent 0-100 performance scale. This ensures fairness, interpretability, and comparability across hospitals and over time.

Methodology
Scoring Accuracy
88.9
/100
Excellent
Calibration
+3.1 points
Pillar
Priority
Priority
Priority High
Scoring Logic
Overview
Pillar
Indicator Normalization 89.7 /100
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Threshold Design 88.4 /100
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Banding Logic 87.9 (per 1,000 patient days)
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Score Transparency 90.1
Excellent
Pillar
Pillar
Interpretability 88.6
Excellent
Pillar
What It Covers
  • Indicator normalization and scaling
  • Scoring bands and performance levels
  • Threshold setting and calibration
  • Indicator directionality (higher/lower is better)
  • Handling of missing or incomplete data
  • Comparability across hospitals and time
  • Transparency and documentation of logic
building
Core Sections
Key Elements
  • 0-100 standardized performance scale
  • Defined performance bands (e.g., Poor to Excellent)
  • Exception and override rules
  • Threshold update and version control
  • Methodological notes and rationale
Risk Signals
  • Unclear or outdated thresholds
  • Distorted banding or cutoffs
  • Score inflation or compression
  • Missing data impacting scores
  • Inconsistent calibration across cycles
Dashboard Preview
slide 1
slide 1
slide 1
slide 1
Improvement Actions
  • Refine thresholds using latest clinical evidence
  • Enhance banding logic for better differentiation
  • Document and communicate rules clearly
  • Review calibration to ensure score fairness
  • Monitor and adjust for score stability over time
Pillar
Want to understand the HPI methodology?
Explore how our scientific, transparent and continuous approach delivers fair and reliable hospital performance insights.
Explore This Method